<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TripAdvisor Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.innkeepingblog.com/2010/06/tripadvisor-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.innkeepingblog.com/2010/06/tripadvisor-update/</link>
	<description>The Innkeeping Industry Blog of the Professional Association of Innkeepers (PAII)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:42:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marti</title>
		<link>http://www.innkeepingblog.com/2010/06/tripadvisor-update/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Marti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 22:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innkeepingblog.com/?p=408#comment-310</guid>
		<description>A great wrap up and thanks for prioritizing the issues that matter.  You&#039;ve been tenacious with TripAdvisor, Jay, and I&#039;ve got to believe it&#039;s helped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great wrap up and thanks for prioritizing the issues that matter.  You&#8217;ve been tenacious with TripAdvisor, Jay, and I&#8217;ve got to believe it&#8217;s helped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil, owner of B&#38;B in Normandy</title>
		<link>http://www.innkeepingblog.com/2010/06/tripadvisor-update/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil, owner of B&#38;B in Normandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innkeepingblog.com/?p=408#comment-308</guid>
		<description>Looks like TA played a stonewalling game on most issues.  Rather like the way they react to owner suggestions on the Owners Forum.  But good for you for trying.

BTW, on the hotels vs. B&amp;B/Inns definitions, it&#039;s not universally true that &quot;A hotel has an operator and front desk that is open 24/7&quot; although that&#039;s the general requirements for a &quot;hotel&quot; that TA uses.  If they applied that systematically then most hotels in France - and I&#039;m talking about the chains like Mercure, Campanile etc. as well as every independently owned hotel - would be classed as B&amp;Bs, because 24 hour desk is NOT the norm.

In our own town of Alençon, France there&#039;s a hotel - part of the &quot;Logis de France&quot; hotel grouping - that has a separate restaurant, conference facilities, dozens of rooms - yet is classed as a B&amp;B!!!  But TA refuse to correct this because of the front desk issue, completely ignoring the fact that none of the other hotels listed for the same town have a 24/24 desk either.  Nuts.

I think that a better definition of B&amp;B is that breakfast must be included in the room price, the owner must live on the premises, and the total capacity/number of rooms is limited (generally 6 or fewer rooms, though some countries allow fewer).  That&#039;s the usual definition used throughout Europe.

Phil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like TA played a stonewalling game on most issues.  Rather like the way they react to owner suggestions on the Owners Forum.  But good for you for trying.</p>
<p>BTW, on the hotels vs. B&amp;B/Inns definitions, it&#8217;s not universally true that &#8220;A hotel has an operator and front desk that is open 24/7&#8243; although that&#8217;s the general requirements for a &#8220;hotel&#8221; that TA uses.  If they applied that systematically then most hotels in France &#8211; and I&#8217;m talking about the chains like Mercure, Campanile etc. as well as every independently owned hotel &#8211; would be classed as B&amp;Bs, because 24 hour desk is NOT the norm.</p>
<p>In our own town of Alençon, France there&#8217;s a hotel &#8211; part of the &#8220;Logis de France&#8221; hotel grouping &#8211; that has a separate restaurant, conference facilities, dozens of rooms &#8211; yet is classed as a B&amp;B!!!  But TA refuse to correct this because of the front desk issue, completely ignoring the fact that none of the other hotels listed for the same town have a 24/24 desk either.  Nuts.</p>
<p>I think that a better definition of B&amp;B is that breakfast must be included in the room price, the owner must live on the premises, and the total capacity/number of rooms is limited (generally 6 or fewer rooms, though some countries allow fewer).  That&#8217;s the usual definition used throughout Europe.</p>
<p>Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.innkeepingblog.com/2010/06/tripadvisor-update/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 02:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innkeepingblog.com/?p=408#comment-307</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t thank you enough for taking this on a as mission for our industry. The report does not thrill me, but the fact that they are listening to you does. Way to go. You the man, Jay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t thank you enough for taking this on a as mission for our industry. The report does not thrill me, but the fact that they are listening to you does. Way to go. You the man, Jay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.innkeepingblog.com/2010/06/tripadvisor-update/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 02:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innkeepingblog.com/?p=408#comment-306</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t thank you enough for taking this on a as mission for our industry. The report does not thrill me, but the fact that they are listening to you does. Way to go. You the man, Jay!I</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t thank you enough for taking this on a as mission for our industry. The report does not thrill me, but the fact that they are listening to you does. Way to go. You the man, Jay!I</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Scherman</title>
		<link>http://www.innkeepingblog.com/2010/06/tripadvisor-update/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Scherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innkeepingblog.com/?p=408#comment-304</guid>
		<description>As always, Jay, thanks for speaking up and standing up for the interests of the Innkeeping industry. All mature industries need active advocacy, and it&#039;s clear today that ours is a mature, and evolving, player in the world of hospitality. And, importantly, it&#039;s comforting to know that we have an advocate in the voice of PAII.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always, Jay, thanks for speaking up and standing up for the interests of the Innkeeping industry. All mature industries need active advocacy, and it&#8217;s clear today that ours is a mature, and evolving, player in the world of hospitality. And, importantly, it&#8217;s comforting to know that we have an advocate in the voice of PAII.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

